Personal product · Marketing / Content SaaS
Contently AI — Multi-Model Social Content SaaS
AI‑powered social content built fast, published faster
- Pages built
- 42
- API endpoints shipped
- 12
- Monthly active users
- 3,200

I'm Md. Emamul Mursalin, an AI agent developer in Bangladesh. I build LLM agents that take real actions — call tools, read and write to your systems, run multi-step workflows — and the retrieval, evaluation and billing infrastructure that turns them into a product people pay for. If you have read enough agency pages promising autonomous agents and want to talk to the person who will actually design the tool schema and the eval set, this is the page.
The gap between a chatbot demo and a production agent is engineering, not prompting. A production agent needs typed tools with validated inputs, memory that does not leak between tenants, guardrails that stop it doing something expensive, retries and fallbacks across model providers, and an evaluation set that tells you whether last week's change made it better or worse. That is the work I do, from Rajshahi, for startups in the US, UK and Europe.
Md. Emamul Mursalin · Rajshahi, Bangladesh · remote worldwide · UTC+6 · Updated
Agent design: deciding what the agent may do, expressing that as tools with strict schemas, and choosing between a single agent with tool calling, a planner-worker pattern, or a graph of specialised agents with handoffs. I use LangGraph for orchestration where state and branching matter, the OpenAI and Anthropic Claude APIs directly where they do not, and MCP servers to expose tools that other agents can share.
Retrieval: chunking and embedding your documents, help centre or database into pgvector, hybrid search with reranking, permission-aware retrieval so users only see what they are allowed to, and citations so answers can be checked. Evaluation: a test set built with you in week one, automated regression gates in CI, and tracing so every agent run can be replayed and costed.
An agent is only a business when it is packaged. My AI Agent SaaS packages wrap the agent in a Next.js product with a NestJS API: sign-in with email and Google, team workspaces with roles and invites, tenant isolation at the database layer, Stripe subscriptions with usage-based add-ons, per-user metering and limits, a streaming chat and agent UI, an admin panel, and CI/CD with tests. Contently AI and Virtual Client are both built this way, and CakeOrFake — an AI screening tool with subscription billing — shows the same pattern in a browser extension.
Starter is $899 and takes two to three weeks: one production agent with tool calling, prompt design with an evaluation set, auth, Stripe billing with one plan, usage metering and a Next.js dashboard. Professional is $2,499 over five to eight weeks: multi-step agent workflows, a RAG pipeline, multi-tenant isolation, team workspaces, three-plan billing with usage add-ons, LLM observability, guardrails and an admin panel. Enterprise is $3,999 over ten to sixteen weeks: multi-agent orchestration, model routing, enterprise RAG with permission-aware retrieval, SSO and audit logs, an automated eval suite in CI and a container deployment with autoscaling.
Global agency figures for the same work are $20,000-50,000 for an advanced agent and well over $60,000 for enterprise builds; US AI agent developers bill $60-150 an hour and up. Hiring an AI agent developer in Bangladesh directly gets you senior engineering at a rate that leaves budget for the API bill.
If users mainly need answers from your content, a RAG chatbot is enough, and my AI Integration packages from $499 cover it. If the product has to do work — create records, send emails, run a process across several systems, decide what to do next — you need an agent. If the work is a fixed sequence with no judgement, a plain automation is cheaper and more reliable than either. Part of the first call is telling you which one you are describing.
Week one is always design: tools, data sources, the evaluation set and a running-cost estimate. After that you get weekly demos of the agent doing real tasks against real data, a shared board, and a fixed call inside the UTC+6 overlap with your day. Contracts include an NDA and full IP assignment; payment is by milestone through Wise, Payoneer or bank transfer; the code and the model-provider accounts are yours.
Proof
Projects built with the same stack and patterns.
Personal product · Marketing / Content SaaS
AI‑powered social content built fast, published faster
Robbie Boyle · EdTech / Corporate Training
Teams rehearse live conversations against AI personas and get rubric-scored feedback.
Ayana · HR Tech / Recruitment Automation
AI-powered Chrome Extension that turns hours of Upwork applicant screening into minutes
“This project was handled in an excellent way. The seller understood the task clearly. Progress updates were helpful. The final output was accurate and polished. Everything arrived as promised. Glad to recommend this seller.”
Alexi Denise
Individual client
“He successfully completed all my tasks quickly and with excellent quality.”
Imran Mohammed
“Great work. Great communication, and a quick turnaround. I'd definitely order again.”
Agrossen
Fixed price
Fixed price, fixed scope. Starter and Enterprise tiers are on the pricing page.
Multi-tenant AI SaaS with RAG and agent workflows
$2,499/project
Launch offer$1,62435% off for the first 5 clients
5-8 weeks
RAG over your data plus automated workflows
$1,299/project
Launch offer$84435% off for the first 5 clients
3-5 weeks
Launch-ready MVP with payments and AI built in
$1,999/project
Launch offer$1,29935% off for the first 5 clients
4-6 weeks
Case studies with the same stack and patterns.
Costs, architecture and how-to guides from the blog.
Questions & answers
With me, $899 for a single-purpose agent product, $2,499 for a multi-tenant agent SaaS with RAG and workflows, and $3,999 for an enterprise multi-agent platform. Global agencies quote $20,000-50,000 for an advanced agent. Running costs — API fees and hosting — are estimated separately in every proposal.
A chatbot answers questions in a conversation. An agent takes actions: it calls tools, reads and writes to your systems, runs multi-step workflows and decides what to do next based on results. Agents need typed tools, memory, guardrails and evaluation sets to behave predictably.
Two to three weeks for a focused single-agent product, five to eight weeks for a multi-tenant SaaS with RAG and agent workflows, ten to sixteen weeks for an enterprise multi-agent platform. The first week is always tool design and an evaluation set.
OpenAI and Anthropic Claude for most reasoning, Groq for fast cheap inference, and open models where privacy requires it, behind a router with fallbacks. LangGraph for stateful orchestration, MCP for shared tools, pgvector for retrieval. I pick per project rather than defaulting to one vendor.
Yes, and that is what my packages are designed for: tenant isolation, team workspaces, Stripe subscriptions with usage add-ons, per-user metering and limits, and an admin panel. Contently AI and Virtual Client are live examples.
For a fixed internal workflow, tools like n8n are cheaper and I will say so. For a product you sell, no-code agents hit limits fast on tenant isolation, evals, cost control and reliability, and rebuilding later costs more than building properly once.
Retrieval with citations for facts, strict tool schemas with validation for actions, human review steps for anything irreversible, spend and rate limits per tenant, and an evaluation set that runs in CI so regressions are caught before they ship.
Next step
A 30-minute call is enough to tell you which package fits, what I would cut, and what it will cost to run. No pitch, no obligation.
Or email hello@mursalinsdesk.com